Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Our Story
    • Partner with us
    • Reach Us
    • Career
    Subscribe Newsletter
    HR KathaHR Katha
    • Exclusive
      • Exclusive Features
      • Research
      • Point Of View
      • Case In Point
      • Dialogue
      • Movement
      • Profile
      • Beyond Work
      • Rising Star
      • By Invitation
    • News
      • Global HR News
      • Compensation & Benefits
      • Diversity
      • Events
      • Gen Y
      • Hiring & Firing
      • HR & Labour Laws
      • Learning & Development
      • Merger & Acquisition
      • Performance Management & Productivity
      • Talent Management
      • Tools & Technology
      • Work-Life Balance
    • Special
      • Cover Story
      • Editorial
      • HR Forecast 2024
      • HR Forecast 2023
      • HR Forecast 2022
      • HR Forecast 2021
      • HR Forecast 2020
      • HR Forecast 2019
      • New Age Learning
      • Coaching and Training
      • Learn-Engage-Transform
    • Magazine
    • Reports
      • Whitepaper
        • HR Forecast 2024 e-mag
        • Future-proofing Manufacturing Through Digital Transformation
        • Employee Healthcare & Wellness Benefits: A Guide for Indian MSMEs
        • Build a Future Ready Organisation For The Road Ahead
        • Employee Experience Strategy
        • HRKatha 2019 Forecast
        • Decoding and Driving Employee Engagement
        • One Platform, Infinite Possibilities
      • Survey Reports
        • Happiness at Work
        • Upskilling for Jobs of the Future
        • The Labour Code 2020
    • Conferences
      • HRKatha Futurecast
      • Automation.NXT
      • The Great HR Debate
    • HR Jobs
    WhatsApp LinkedIn X (Twitter) Facebook Instagram
    HR KathaHR Katha
    Home»News»IR & Labour Laws New»Can’t deny maternity leave just because marriage isn’t registered: Madras HC
    IR & Labour Laws New

    Can’t deny maternity leave just because marriage isn’t registered: Madras HC

    In the presence of prima facie evidence, it is wrong to reject application for maternity leave on the basis of mere assumptions
    Liji Narayan | HRKathaBy Liji Narayan | HRKathaApril 1, 20252 Mins Read6513 Views
    Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook
    Madras High Court
    Share
    LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

    The Madras High Court stated that although maternity leave is granted to married women, the registration of the marriage is not compulsory for seeking maternity leave, unless the very validity of the marriage is questionable.

    In the said case, the petitioner was employed as an office assistant in the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate’s Court, when her husband died in 2020. Sometime later, she developed a relationship with another man and eventually got married and became pregnant. However, when she applied for maternity leave, her application was rejected because she failed to produce a marriage certificate and the Judicial Magistrate’s Court felt she wasn’t entitled to the leave since she conceived before the marriage happened.

    The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate (‘Magistrate’) doubted the validity of her marriage because she had lodged a complaint in March of 2024 alleging that her husband had lured her into a relationship with the promise of marriage due to which she had ended up conceiving. She had registered an FIR following which her husband was able to get off on anticipatory bail. When the elders and friends intervened, the two tied the knot at a temple. She was able to submit photographs of the wedding and the wedding invitation itself as proof of having married the man in the presence of near and dear ones. Yet, the magistrate maintained that the FIR wasn’t proof of marriage.

    The High Court’s division bench of R. Subramanian and G. Arul Murugan, JJ observed that it was “inhuman” of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate to deny the woman maternity leave simply because there was no formal registration of the union. At a time when even live-in relationships are recognised by the apex court, the Magistrate appeared to have been unjustly looking for excuses to disbelieve her claims of marriage and deny her leave.

    The office assistant was, therefore, awarded a compensation of Rs 1 lakh for the mental suffering she had to undergo and also granted her the maternity leave she was entitled to. As per the Court, the petitioner would have to be granted maternity leave against full pay starting from the date of her application.

    Arul Court deny maternity leave District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Employee employer full pay G. Arul Murugan HR Human Resources J&J justice law Madras High Court marriage proof marriage registered marriage registration maternity leave mental agony Murugan prima facie proof of marriage R. Subramanian registration of marriage ruling Subramanian Workforce
    Share. LinkedIn Twitter Facebook
    Liji Narayan | HRKatha

    HRKatha prides itself in being a good journalistic product and Liji deserves all the credit for it. Thanks to her, our readers get clean copies to read every morning while our writers are kept on their toes.

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    5 + 16 =

    Related Posts

    SV Nathan joins PwC as country leader

    May 15, 2025

    Amazon eliminates 100 jobs from Devices and Services division

    May 15, 2025

    Third Bracket secures INR 50 Million in seed funding

    May 15, 2025

    NASA employee dismissed amid DEI programme shutdown

    May 15, 2025
    EDITOR'S PICKS

    “Dark factories still a decade away from disrupting India’s employment market,” Sushil Baveja, CHRO, Jindal Stainless

    May 15, 2025

    How Pramerica Life builds an ethical culture that works

    May 15, 2025

    Red flags in job applications: What candidates miss but recruiters spot

    May 14, 2025

    Managing Gen Z in the workplace: Listening to what isn’t said

    May 13, 2025
    Latest Post

    SV Nathan joins PwC as country leader

    Movement May 15, 2025

    SV Nathan has joined PwC as its country leader. In this role, he will spearhead…

    Amazon eliminates 100 jobs from Devices and Services division

    News May 15, 2025

    Amazon has announced the layoff of 100 employees from its Devices and Services division, which…

    Third Bracket secures INR 50 Million in seed funding

    News May 15, 2025

    AI-driven hiring platform Third Bracket has raised close to INR 50 million in seed funding,…

    NASA employee dismissed amid DEI programme shutdown

    News May 15, 2025

    NASA has reportedly terminated a Caribbean-origin employee after the dismantling of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and…

    Asia's No.1 HR Platform

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn WhatsApp Bluesky
    • Our Story
    • Partner with us
    • Career
    • Reach Us
    • Exclusive Features
    • Cover Story
    • Editorial
    • Dive into the Future of Work: Download HRForecast 2024 Now!
    © 2025 HRKatha.com
    • Disclaimer
    • Refunds & Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.