The case centred around petitioners employed on a contingent basis by the corporation. Their abrupt termination stemmed from an ‘Alert Note’ issued by the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) alleging irregularities in their appointments. However, the court, represented by senior advocate Z.A. Qureshi, contested the lack of due process afforded to the employees.
The petitioners argued that they were denied the right to defend themselves against the accusations, a violation of natural justice. They further claimed knowledge of an ongoing committee exploring a policy for contractual staff appointments, suggesting the corporation’s actions were pre-emptive and unfair.
While the corporation emphasised the limited job security inherent in contract positions, the court countered by highlighting the reputational damage inflicted by the termination. Justice Chowdhary stressed that the accusations targeted the managing director, not the petitioners themselves, yet their livelihoods and reputations were adversely affected without due process.
The court’s ruling upholds the principle of fair hearing, even for contract workers. It emphasises that termination based on allegations, particularly those implicating professional conduct and potentially stigmatising, necessitates a thorough investigation and the opportunity for rebuttal. This decision protects against arbitrary dismissal and sets a precedent for safeguarding the rights of vulnerable categories of workers.
