Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Our Story
    • Partner with us
    • Reach Us
    • Career
    Subscribe Newsletter
    HR KathaHR Katha
    • Exclusive
      • Exclusive Features
      • Research
      • Point Of View
      • Case In Point
      • Dialogue
      • Movement
      • Profile
      • Beyond Work
      • Rising Star
      • By Invitation
    • News
      • Global HR News
      • Compensation & Benefits
      • Diversity
      • Events
      • Gen Y
      • Hiring & Firing
      • HR & Labour Laws
      • Learning & Development
      • Merger & Acquisition
      • Performance Management & Productivity
      • Talent Management
      • Tools & Technology
      • Work-Life Balance
    • Special
      • Cover Story
      • Editorial
      • HR Forecast 2024
      • HR Forecast 2023
      • HR Forecast 2022
      • HR Forecast 2021
      • HR Forecast 2020
      • HR Forecast 2019
      • New Age Learning
      • Coaching and Training
      • Learn-Engage-Transform
    • Magazine
    • Reports
      • Whitepaper
        • HR Forecast 2024 e-mag
        • Future-proofing Manufacturing Through Digital Transformation
        • Employee Healthcare & Wellness Benefits: A Guide for Indian MSMEs
        • Build a Future Ready Organisation For The Road Ahead
        • Employee Experience Strategy
        • HRKatha 2019 Forecast
        • Decoding and Driving Employee Engagement
        • One Platform, Infinite Possibilities
      • Survey Reports
        • Happiness at Work
        • Upskilling for Jobs of the Future
        • The Labour Code 2020
    • Conferences
      • Rising Star Leadership Awards
      • HRKatha Futurecast
      • Automation.NXT
      • The Great HR Debate
    • HR Jobs
    WhatsApp LinkedIn X (Twitter) Facebook Instagram
    HR KathaHR Katha
    Home»By Invitation»Emotions decoded: Should performance feedback focus only on the task?
    By Invitation

    Emotions decoded: Should performance feedback focus only on the task?

    Sumagna BhowmickBy Sumagna BhowmickMarch 29, 2018Updated:February 1, 20193 Mins Read6363 Views
    Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook
    Share
    LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

    In a dyadic situation of performance feedback, a supervisor, because of his empowered position, can display a range of emotions, which can affect the subordinate.

    Performance feedback, in any organisation, is an exchange of task-related information. A performance reviewer would like to believe that, when talking about someone’s task, the best thing is to remain neutral and be an emotional gate keeper. In other words, simple control emotional flow and stick to the purpose of the act. This belief is based on the perception that human beings are logical, and expressing emotions in a feedback situation can be dysfunctional and a step closer to irrationality.

    But are we so rational? Are we skilled at suppressing our emotions, and using our judgement wisely? Maybe not. Perhaps, it is nearly impossible to shut one’s emotional gate because emotions are constant to the existence of life. Emotions are almost felt continuously through the ongoing relationships or transactions we encounter. Similarly, any encounter between a supervisor and a subordinate can’t be completely unemotional.

    Emotions are also structural in nature. For example, a boss can shout at his employee by virtue of his structural power. In a dyadic situation of performance feedback, a supervisor, because of his empowered position, can display a range of emotions, which can affect the subordinate. For example, a supervisor can express anger in response to poor performance, or can express joy in response to superior task performance. This emotional information is decoded along with the task information and influences the affective state of the recipient. Forbes magazine, in their 2012 article ‘Why We Hate Giving Feedback-and How to Make It Easier’, mentioned that supervisors are worried about the reactions of the recipient because some might get angry or start crying. But, are we missing something here?

    Are these reactions not in response to the supervisor’s emotional display while giving feedback?

    In an experiment on failure feedback, Jhonshon and Connelly in 2014 manipulated the emotional display (anger, disappointment, neutral) through fictitious e-mails. Participants were given an assignment where they had to take up a role of a marketing specialist for a fictional consulting firm. They were presented with a task description and a deadline. On turning in their work assignment, they received a feedback from the fictitious work supervisor. Later, the same participants were asked to work on another new assignment. Results indicated that feedback, when given in an angry manner, resulted in experiencing higher levels of anger on the part of the receivers. Anger evoked more anger, which further made the participants like the supervisor less. Display of disappointment evoked guilt in the participants and they engaged more in reparative behaviours.

    Performance feedback can never be just an evaluative communication devoid of emotions. While giving positive feedback, a range of positive emotions—joy, pride, interest, and so on—can be experienced by both the source and the recipient of the feedback. On the other hand, negative emotions—anger, disgust, guilt, anxiety, and sadness—can be felt while giving and receiving negative feedback. Thus, performance feedback is a communication, which contains: i) task-related information, and ii) the emotional pleasure-displeasure dimension of information. In fact, it is the latter which influences the further solving of complex task-related problems, and in turn leads to higher (or lower) job satisfaction. Since each emotion has a different route of impact, supervisors can use their discretion to display a particular emotion, or set of such emotions, which influences the subordinate more positively.

    (The author is a PHD scholar at TISS Mumbai)

    Emotions performance feedback
    Share. LinkedIn Twitter Facebook
    Sumagna Bhowmick

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    twenty + four =

    Related Posts

    Psychological safety: the new superpower in winning the talent war

    June 18, 2025

    Why employee value cannot be measured only by KPIs

    June 3, 2025

    Why every organisation should hire a chief happiness ‘pawficer’

    May 30, 2025

    The culture that’s quietly killing us

    May 21, 2025

    QUICK HR INSIGHTS

    EDITOR'S PICKS

    How Castrol India is retraining its workforce for the electric age

    July 16, 2025

    Mahindra Holidays turns to local communities for talent as India’s hospitality schools empty out

    July 15, 2025

    Why ‘Centres of Excellence’ can hollow out the very culture they’re meant to strengthen

    July 14, 2025

    How a thumbs-up became a generational minefield

    July 11, 2025
    Latest Post

    Dipty Jalan returns to Usha International, as CHRO

    Movement July 16, 2025

    Dipty Jalan has returned to Usha International as chief human resources officer (SVP HR). After…

    Centre to revamp 1,000 ITIs to boost youth skilling

    News July 16, 2025

    In a major move to transform India’s vocational training ecosystem, the Central government is set…

    Nissan to shut down historic Oppama plant by 2028

    News July 16, 2025

    Nissan Motor Co. has confirmed plans to permanently close its iconic Oppama plant in Kanagawa…

    AP government employees raise concerns over ineffective health scheme

    News July 16, 2025

    Andhra Pradesh’s Employees’ Health Scheme (EHS), introduced in 2013 to provide cashless, quality medical care,…

    Asia's No.1 HR Platform

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn WhatsApp Bluesky
    • Our Story
    • Partner with us
    • Career
    • Reach Us
    • Exclusive Features
    • Cover Story
    • Editorial
    • Dive into the Future of Work: Download HRForecast 2024 Now!
    © 2025 HRKatha.com
    • Disclaimer
    • Refunds & Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.