The Supreme Court has made it clear that public employment cannot allow exceptions based on sympathy. In a recent case, the Court overturned earlier rulings that had given a police constable candidate another chance to take his physical test after missing it due to illness.
The candidate had cleared the first stage of Delhi Police recruitment but failed to attend the Physical Endurance and Measurement Test scheduled for January 2024. He later claimed to have sent requests for rescheduling, citing fever and body pain. The Tribunal and High Court had allowed him a second chance, but the Delhi Police challenged this decision in the Supreme Court.
The bench observed that recruitment processes involve thousands of applicants, and rules must apply equally to all. The advertisement had clearly stated that test schedules were final and could not be changed. The Court noted that the candidate did not even show up at the venue to explain his situation, which reflected a lack of seriousness.
The judges stressed that compassion, charity, or special treatment cannot override fairness in public employment. Belonging to a reserved category also does not entitle a candidate to exceptions. The Court explained that opportunities in government jobs are rare and highly competitive, so candidates must seize them when they arise.
By allowing the Delhi Police’s appeal, the Court reinforced the principle that recruitment rules must be strictly followed. The ruling highlights that fairness and equal opportunity are the guiding principles in public employment, leaving little room for personal discretion or sympathy.
