‘Compliance’ is a word that often triggers aversion. Whether it’s seen as a cumbersome exercise or an additional financial burden, the benefits of compliance can be overshadowed by the challenges of implementation. The Prevention of Sexual Harassment (PoSH) Act is no exception.
While some companies view compliance with the PoSH Act as a mandatory task, there’s a significant number that seek to sidestep what they consider an added financial obligation. Ignorance plays a pivotal role in this reluctance, with concerns that implementing the PoSH Act may lead to an influx of sexual-harassment complaints. The fear stems from the idea that employees may become more vocal about such issues once a formal process is in place, creating apprehension among organisations.
For small businesses, the challenge is genuine, as they often lack the resources needed for effective PoSH Act implementation. Forming an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC), providing training and conducting investigations require bandwidth that smaller enterprises may struggle to spare.
Moreover, certain segments and cultures may trivialise sexual harassment in the workplace, discouraging employees from stepping forward with complaints. In such cases, organisations may, regrettably, not accord the process the gravity it necessitates, further complicating compliance.
The consequences of non-compliance with the PoSH Act are weighty, extending beyond mere monetary penalties to the erosion of a company’s reputation.
In this edition, we plunge into the intricate factors thwarting corporate assimilation of the PoSH Act, casting light on the challenges faced and the repercussions of failing to comply.
Happy and insightful reading!
Cheers!