Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Our Story
    • Partner with us
    • Reach Us
    • Career
    Subscribe Newsletter
    HR KathaHR Katha
    • Exclusive
      • Exclusive Features
      • Perspectives
      • Friday Features
      • herSTORY
      • Case-In-Point
      • Point Of View
      • Research
      • HR Pops
      • Dialogue
      • Movement
      • Profile
      • Beyond Work
      • Rising Star
      • By Invitation
    • News
      • Global HR News
      • Compensation & Benefits
      • Diversity
      • Events
      • Gen Y
      • Hiring & Firing
      • HR & Labour Laws
      • Learning & Development
      • Merger & Acquisition
      • Performance Management & Productivity
      • Talent Management
      • Tools & Technology
      • Work-Life Balance
    • Special
      • HR Forecast 2026
      • Cover Story
      • Editorial
      • HR Forecast 2024
      • HR Forecast 2023
      • HR Forecast 2022
      • HR Forecast 2021
      • HR Forecast 2020
      • HR Forecast 2019
      • New Age Learning
      • Coaching and Training
      • Learn-Engage-Transform
    • Magazine
    • Reports
      • Whitepaper
        • HR Forecast 2024 e-mag
        • Future-proofing Manufacturing Through Digital Transformation
        • Employee Healthcare & Wellness Benefits: A Guide for Indian MSMEs
        • Build a Future Ready Organisation For The Road Ahead
        • Employee Experience Strategy
        • HRKatha 2019 Forecast
        • Decoding and Driving Employee Engagement
        • One Platform, Infinite Possibilities
      • Survey Reports
        • Happiness at Work
        • Upskilling for Jobs of the Future
        • The Labour Code 2020
    • Conferences
      • Leadership Summit 2025
      • Rising Star Leadership Awards
      • HRKatha Futurecast
      • Automation.NXT
      • The Great HR Debate
    • HR Jobs
    WhatsApp LinkedIn X (Twitter) Facebook Instagram
    HR KathaHR Katha
    zoha
    Home»Exclusive Features»How is talent hoarding turning out to be expensive for an organisation?
    Exclusive Features

    How is talent hoarding turning out to be expensive for an organisation?

    Saheba Khatun | HRKathaBy Saheba Khatun | HRKathaJuly 20, 20235 Mins Read7065 Views
    Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook WhatsApp
    Share
    LinkedIn Twitter Facebook WhatsApp

    Amidst a fiercely-competitive business landscape, talent is widely recognised as a valuable asset for any organisation. After all, it is common knowledge that skilled and motivated employees drive innovation, productivity and profitability. Not surprisingly then, some companies inadvertently fall into the trap of talent hoarding. They retain talented individuals without offering them opportunities for growth and advancement. While most employers hoard talent as a safeguard against losing top performers, the long-term consequences of doing so can be both detrimental and expensive for the organisation.

    Tanaya Mishra, VP and head – HR, Endo International, emphasises the importance of ensuring a strong talent pipeline and implementing succession planning as an essential step in talent management. However, when companies begin to hoard talent without providing opportunities for growth and challenge, they may encounter significant issues.

    zoha

    “Holding onto talent without providing them with avenues to grow and contribute can result in the loss of valuable employees who are eager to make a difference. It is crucial for organisations to recognise and address the aspirations of their high-potential individuals to keep them engaged and committed to the company’s vision and goals”

    Tanaya Mishra, VP and head – HR, Endo International 

     

    P Dwarakanath, former non-executive chairman, GSK, believes that the challenge arises when businesses retain talent that may not remain effective or productive in the long term. “Instead of optimising talent based on ongoing assessments of learning agility and relevancy, some companies hold on to individuals solely because they were previously identified as stars,” observes Dwarakanath.

    Decreased employee productivity

    zoha

    Talent hoarding restricts the movement of skilled employees within the organisation, leading to stagnation in their roles. Without new challenges or opportunities to learn and develop professionally, talented individuals may experience decreased motivation and productivity. In a static work environment, employees are less likely to be engaged, impacting overall team dynamics. This can lead to a dip in the organisation’s productivity levels.

    Increased employee turnover

    One of the most significant costs associated with talent hoarding is the increased likelihood of employee turnover. Talented individuals who feel trapped in their roles and see no prospects for advancement are more likely to seek new opportunities elsewhere. The recruitment process to replace these employees can be expensive, including recruitment agency fees, advertising costs and the time invested in interviews and onboarding for new hires. Moreover, the loss of institutional knowledge and experience when top performers leave can have a detrimental impact on the company’s overall performance.

    Negative impact on company culture

    “Instead of optimising talent based on ongoing assessments of learning agility and relevancy, some companies hold on to individuals solely because they were previously identified as stars”

    P Dwarakanath, former non-executive chairman, GSK

    Talent hoarding can create a toxic work culture where employees perceive favouritism and a lack of transparency. When some individuals are seemingly protected from internal competition, it can breed resentment and dissatisfaction among other employees. This leads to a fragmented work environment, hampering collaboration and teamwork, which are crucial components of any successful organisation.

    Reduced innovation and creativity

    Talented employees are often the driving force behind innovation and creative problem solving within a company. When these individuals are confined to their current roles without the freedom to explore new challenges, the organisation loses out on their potential to generate fresh ideas and drive meaningful change. Over time, this stagnation can hinder the company’s ability to adapt to market demands and stay ahead of competition.

    Why is talent hoarding best avoided?

    Talent hoarding can prove to be a costly practice for businesses. Keeping skilled employees without providing them with meaningful work and growth opportunities can lead to reduced productivity, increased turnover costs, and missed opportunities for innovation and growth. Moreover, it can create a negative company culture, impacting employee morale and overall efficiency.

    As Emmanuel David, senior HR leader, points out, “There comes a point when organisations must carefully consider their actions to avoid cultural disruptions and potential departures. Balancing the retention of experienced individuals with providing opportunities for new talent becomes crucial to maintaining a dynamic and effective workforce.”

    David shares that in a competitive market, overlooking the growth and development of new talent may lead to a missed opportunity to build a strong team capable of thriving in challenging environments. It is essential for organisations to strike a balance and ensure that talent is both engaged and strategically positioned to contribute effectively.

    “There comes a point when organisations must carefully consider their actions to avoid cultural disruptions and potential departures”

    Emmanuel David, senior HR leader

    Dwarakanath explains, “In the rapidly changing business landscape, learning agility and relevance are vital for talent to remain valuable. Progressive companies engage in continuous talent review and identification to ensure that individuals are consistently meeting the demands of the evolving business environment. This ongoing evaluation ensures that talent remains engaged, adaptable and aligned with the organisation’s future goals.”

    “Holding onto talent without providing them with avenues to grow and contribute can result in the loss of valuable employees who are eager to make a difference. It is crucial for organisations to recognise and address the aspirations of their high-potential individuals to keep them engaged and committed to the company’s vision and goals. By doing so, companies can retain their talented workforce and foster a culture of innovation and success,” points out Mishra.

    Talent hoarding may seem like a protective measure to retain skilled employees, but the long-term consequences can be disastrous for any organisation. Instead, organisations should focus on nurturing a growth-oriented work environment that encourages employee development, provides opportunities for advancement, and values the contributions of all team members. By fostering a culture of professional growth and appreciation, companies can not only retain their top talent but also thrive in an ever-evolving business landscape.

    Emmanuel David expensive Organisation P dwarkanath talent hoarding Tanaya Mishra
    Share. LinkedIn Twitter Facebook WhatsApp
    Saheba Khatun | HRKatha
    • Website

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Related Posts

    Case-in-Point: Exit interview truth vs managerial reputation

    June 18, 2026

    herSTORY: Girija Kolagada, VP HRBP & India Country Leader, Progress Software

    June 18, 2026

    HR Perspectives by Amit Sharda: “Succession planning reveals itself during transitions, not before them”

    June 17, 2026

    757 candidates compete for every VP HR role. HR Technologists face just five rivals.

    June 17, 2026
    Editorial

    The two cultures inside the same multinational

    Someone I know works with one of the world’s largest technology and consulting firms. Based…

    Why HR becomes conservative when hiring HR

    Hire for potential, not just pedigree. Look beyond industry boundaries. Avoid groupthink. Value transferable capability.…

    EDITOR'S PICKS

    Case-in-Point: Exit interview truth vs managerial reputation

    June 18, 2026

    herSTORY: Girija Kolagada, VP HRBP & India Country Leader, Progress Software

    June 18, 2026

    HR Perspectives by Amit Sharda: “Succession planning reveals itself during transitions, not before them”

    June 17, 2026

    757 candidates compete for every VP HR role. HR Technologists face just five rivals.

    June 17, 2026
    Latest Post

    Janaki Kirloskar named joint MD of Kirloskar Electric, returns to family legacy

    Movement June 18, 2026

    Kirloskar Electric Company has appointed Janaki Kirloskar as the joint managing director, marking her return…

    Kerala employees await pay revision as budget balances welfare and fiscal pressures

    News June 18, 2026

    The upcoming Kerala state budget is expected to address one of the most closely watched…

    Maharashtra raises DA for MSRTC employees to 58%

    News June 18, 2026

    Employees of the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) will receive a higher Dearness Allowance…

    Madras HC denies special grade benefit to employee who delayed joining promotion

    News June 18, 2026

    The Madras High Court has ruled that an employee cannot claim Special Grade benefits by…

    Asia's No.1 HR Platform

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn WhatsApp Bluesky
    • Our Story
    • Partner with us
    • Career
    • Reach Us
    • Exclusive Features
    • Cover Story
    • Editorial
    • Dive into the Future of Work: Download HRForecast 2024 Now!
    © 2026 HRKatha.com
    • Disclaimer
    • Refunds & Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.