Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Our Story
    • Partner with us
    • Reach Us
    • Career
    Subscribe Newsletter
    HR KathaHR Katha
    • Exclusive
      • Exclusive Features
      • Research
      • Point Of View
      • Case In Point
      • Dialogue
      • Movement
      • Profile
      • Beyond Work
      • Rising Star
      • By Invitation
    • News
      • Global HR News
      • Compensation & Benefits
      • Diversity
      • Events
      • Gen Y
      • Hiring & Firing
      • HR & Labour Laws
      • Learning & Development
      • Merger & Acquisition
      • Performance Management & Productivity
      • Talent Management
      • Tools & Technology
      • Work-Life Balance
    • Special
      • Cover Story
      • Editorial
      • HR Forecast 2024
      • HR Forecast 2023
      • HR Forecast 2022
      • HR Forecast 2021
      • HR Forecast 2020
      • HR Forecast 2019
      • New Age Learning
      • Coaching and Training
      • Learn-Engage-Transform
    • Magazine
    • Reports
      • Whitepaper
        • HR Forecast 2024 e-mag
        • Future-proofing Manufacturing Through Digital Transformation
        • Employee Healthcare & Wellness Benefits: A Guide for Indian MSMEs
        • Build a Future Ready Organisation For The Road Ahead
        • Employee Experience Strategy
        • HRKatha 2019 Forecast
        • Decoding and Driving Employee Engagement
        • One Platform, Infinite Possibilities
      • Survey Reports
        • Happiness at Work
        • Upskilling for Jobs of the Future
        • The Labour Code 2020
    • Conferences
      • Rising Star Leadership Awards
      • HRKatha Futurecast
      • Automation.NXT
      • The Great HR Debate
    • HR Jobs
    WhatsApp LinkedIn X (Twitter) Facebook Instagram
    HR KathaHR Katha
    Home»Special»Campus Connect»Performance appraisal biases – one should avoid
    Campus Connect

    Performance appraisal biases – one should avoid

    mmBy Prajjal Saha | HRKathaMarch 29, 201610 Mins Read7197 Views
    Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook
    Share
    LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

    Here are some strategies employed or measures taken by reviewees, to which the managers often fall prey and end up forming biased notions.

    During appraisal time, all managers and human resources are busy sending reminders, collecting and sharing feedback, and providing ratings to employees and managers. Appraisals are important to determine the performance of people— individual goals as against organisational goals. Have we ever given any thought to how critical it is to provide constructive feedback, which in turn, tends to keep motivation high?

    The impact of feedback is not only seen on rating but on the minds of the employees, for the next twelve months. It is important to appraise the line managers and manager of appraisal feedbacks. Few things, if taken into consideration, will help the managers assess the team for 12 months performance and also consider other attributes.

    Here are some of the do’s for managers. While giving feedback, supervisors should consider KSAO (Knowledge, skills, ability, other attributes.)

    Knowledge: Scale the employees on their work knowledge, and understand the level of each individual. Each employee should possess the required information and clear knowledge of the basics.

    Skills: Consider the proficiency of the skills utilised over 12 months. Judge experience and implementation of skills in a desired manner, to evaluate the expected results.

    Other attributes could be politeness, courteousness, good listening skills, working environment and required support from mentors.
    Mentors should take into consideration the prejudices which one should avoid in their feedback.

    At times, mentors remember one incidence which could have gone wrong and its after effects are seen in the appraisal forms.

    HR can help and guide their team members about the biases which need to be looked upon and communicate them to the line managers to help them provide constructive feedback.

    It is observed that as the appraisal month approaches, all are busy attaining their set KRA.

    They start concentrating on their job and try to perform their best to impress their managers. Suddenly there is an upswing in performance. There is a difference in the overall approach.

    These are strategies employed or measures taken by reviewees, to which the managers often fall prey and end up forming biased notions.

    Let us look at these biases one by one:

    First Impression (primacy effect): In this, the rater forms an overall impression about the ratee. Sometimes the candidate is selected and interviewed by other leads while being recruited for some other team. As a result, team managers end up with team members whom they have not assessed at the time of interview. So, they may not find the joinees fit as per their needs, because they are selected by someone else. This leads to the managers forming false impressions about the new joinees. These impressions are retained by the managers. Mentors also take into account these factors and give feedback during the appraisal.

    Managers should try avoiding their own perceptions and impressions. They should merely concentrate on the work carried out by the team member concerned in the last 12 months, against their KRA.

    Halo Effect: In this an employee is rated high in all areas because of one thing they are good at.

    In other words, the manager thinks highly of an employee and instead of rating independently for each item (KSAO), the manager inflates the ratings. At times, the team members’ past individual goals are taken into consideration but their overall performance in the 12 months, their behaviour with colleagues, their people management skills, especially if they are handling a team, along with integrity issues get ignored.

    At times, promotions are given in haste and later these very managers face problems and approach HR for demotions or terminations.

    Horn Effect: On the flip side, employees are often rated as poor performers because of one thing they didn’t do well. Simply put, the individual’s performance is completely appraised on the basis of a negative quality or feature perceived. This results in an overall lower rating than may be warranted.

    At times, mentors remember one incidence which could have gone wrong and its after effects are seen in the appraisal forms. If we consider the admin profile, many times there are certain external forces which are not in control of the admin team. The work of the admin team depends on the vendor’s response, their services and the staff. If the vendor doesn’t turn up with the required order details then the admin person is thought to be responsible for the non-fulfilment of tasks. The other constraints for the failure are completely ignored.

    Similar situations arise in IT companies as well, when there is project-based work wherein the developer’s work is based on others’ inputs. If there is a delay in delivery due to the absence of one of the team members or due to some holidays, which hampers individual delivery time, then these factors should be considered and the level of dependency should be noted.

    Managers should concentrate on ROWE (Result only work environment) wherein employees are paid for results (output) rather than the number of hours worked or breaks taken with other peer members. This focus on met or unmet results allows significant freedom to the mentors to concentrate on final output rather than on few minute details of the employees’ daily routine. Taking a break from other group members should not be a matter of concern for any mentor, but taking breaks with only one’s own team cannot be made a rule. Breaks are taken to get some time to do what one wishes, and that could be spending time with any peer member in the organisation. ROWE approach leads teams towards an agile, result-focussed platform.

    Excessive Stiffness or Lenience: Depending upon the reviewers’ own canons, values and physical and mental makeup at the time of appraisal, the ratees may be rated very strictly or leniently. Some of the managers are likely to take the line of least resistance and rate people high, whereas others, by nature, believe in the tyranny of exact assessment, considering more particularly the drawbacks of the individual and thus making the assessment excessively severe. The leniency can render a system ineffective. If everyone is to be rated high, the system has not done anything to differentiate among the employees.

    Just because some team members are on good terms outside office, they end up getting a high rating and those who are not outspoken but good performers, end up in the monitoring zone.

    At times, feedback is given in a casual manner to a team member, despite the fact that the member has already been in the company for long. This is because it is assumed that he/she is performing well. Hence, there is not much to say. At times, managers start recording some minor errors that have occurred in the recent past and list them all during the appraisal meeting. Even if it is related to some team conflicts with team leads which would have been resolved later.

    Central Tendency: Reviewers are not able to give constructive feedback and want to maintain good terms with the team. Hence, they opt for neutral feedback. Appraisers rate all employees as average performers—neither high nor low, and follow the middle path.
    Mentors do not exist to make the team happy or sad. They are given authority and delegation to get the work done. Unless precise feedback is given to the team, the members will not lead anywhere. High performers will get demotivated while low performers will continue to have a casual approach.

    Personal Biases: The way a supervisor feels about each of the individuals working under him —whether he likes or dislikes them — as a tremendous effect on the rating of their performances.

    At times just because some team members are on good terms outside office, they end up getting a high rating. As a result, some team members who are not outspoken but good performers, end up in the monitoring zone, just because they do not share any out-of-office bonding with the managers. Personal bias can come from information obtained from colleagues, considerations of faith and thinking, social and family background and so on.

    Spillover Effect: If a team member had one key achievement in the distant past, it is assumed that he would be continuing the same performance. The present performance is evaluated more on the basis of past performance. If some employee was kept on PIP (performance improvement plan) then it is assumed that he is still performing low.

    Recency Effect: As the term suggests it occurs at a time immediately before the present. The employee’s most recent behaviour becomes the primary focus of the review. The rating is influenced by the most recent behaviour ignoring the commonly demonstrated behaviours during the entire appraisal period. As stated in the beginning, the reviewee shows consistent performance for recent months, and the punctuality graph goes high. Smart employees ensure that these things are observed by their supervisors and very often supervisors consider the employees’ recent activities and rate them as per current occurrences. When poor performers do something terrific, their past performance is forgotten. If excellent performers make mistakes, it weighs down the rest of the review.

    If an employee has taken a long leave recently due to some personal emergency and again approaches the supervisor for a day’s leave just after one month of resuming duty, then the manager just concludes that the employee is in the habit of taking too many leaves; that this hampers the productivity, and therefore, her/his contribution is assumed to be low. It is forgotten that the same employee had put in extra efforts whenever the business demanded and stretched for hours together during the assessment period of 12 months.

    Supervisors may not keep the HR jargons in mind but HR could make them understand biases which could be avoided.

    Managers tend to consider appraisals as rather time consuming. Instead, they should approach the performance appraisal process as a golden opportunity to give their staff feedback, listen to employees’ comments, review the job description, and discuss and correct performance problems.

    Use performance pots to simplify employee reviews. You may sit down to prepare a staff member’s review and realise that you can remember only what the person has done in the past few weeks. Or, you allow only a single incident (good or bad) to colour your assessment. If you’re relying solely on your memory to evaluate employee performance, you’re making appraisals far more difficult than necessary. It is best to institute a simple recording system to document employee performance. Performance logs don’t need to be complicated or sophisticated. They can simply be paper files in a folder or computer files. Opt for whatever is most comfortable.

    In the present scenario, many companies are doing away with the practice of appraisals and opting for periodical reviews. Still, these biases can always help to provide constructive feedback to employees.

    (The author works with a talent solutions company.)

    performance appraisal Performance Review
    Share. LinkedIn Twitter Facebook
    mm
    Prajjal Saha | HRKatha

    Dr. Prajjal Saha, editor and publisher of HRKatha since 2015, leverages over 25 years of experience in business journalism, writing, and editing. He founded HRKatha to provide insightful analysis on the evolving workplace. With expertise spanning HR, marketing, distribution, and technology, Saha has a deep understanding of business dynamics. His authorship of the acclaimed Marketing White Book highlights his versatility beyond HR. A trusted voice across industries, his clear and thoughtful commentary has earned him a reputation for thought leadership, making him a reliable source of knowledge and insights for professionals navigating the complexities of the business world.

    4 Comments

    1. Baiju on March 30, 2016 12:48 pm

      Excellently presented Archana, keep it up.

      Reply
    2. Baiju on March 30, 2016 12:48 pm

      Excellently presented Archana, keep it up.

      Reply
    3. Shivali Wandre on April 8, 2016 1:05 pm

      Excellent information.

      Reply
    4. Tinah on September 9, 2017 10:11 am

      Very good information and it helped me do my assignment

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    20 − 2 =

    Related Posts

    Microsoft to let go poor performers; ban their rehiring for 2 years

    April 23, 2025

    Rs 4.5 lakh for 2 months avg. stipend of top 10% of TISS Mumbai’s HRM & LR batch 2024-26

    March 7, 2025

    Highest salary offer of Rs 78 lakhs made at SPJ Global

    February 21, 2025

    TCS to rely on campus hiring to expand workforce by 40,000

    January 16, 2025

    QUICK HR INSIGHTS

    EDITOR'S PICKS

    The invisible crisis: why workers are quietly checking out

    June 24, 2025

    How corporate culture change dies a thousand small deaths

    June 23, 2025

    The Great Displacement: How automation is reshaping India’s workforce

    June 20, 2025

    How corporate prejudices are strangling innovation in the workplace

    June 19, 2025
    Latest Post

    Pooja Joshi transitions to senior director, HRBP, Qualcomm

    Movement June 25, 2025

    Pooja Joshi has been elevated to senior director, HRBP, Qualcomm. As she says in her…

    NMDC to empower tribal youth with professional skills for livelihood

    Learning & Development June 25, 2025

    National Mineral Development Corporation (NMDC), the Indian iron ore producer, is inviting applications for its…

    Hyundai Motor India nears new wage agreement with recognised union

    News June 24, 2025

    Hyundai Motor India (HMIL), the passenger car manufacturer, is set to finalise a new long-term…

    Is AI overhyped? 62% employees say ‘Yes’!

    Research June 24, 2025

    A whopping 78 per cent of employees are using artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the…

    Asia's No.1 HR Platform

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn WhatsApp Bluesky
    • Our Story
    • Partner with us
    • Career
    • Reach Us
    • Exclusive Features
    • Cover Story
    • Editorial
    • Dive into the Future of Work: Download HRForecast 2024 Now!
    © 2025 HRKatha.com
    • Disclaimer
    • Refunds & Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.