Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Our Story
    • Partner with us
    • Reach Us
    • Career
    Subscribe Newsletter
    HR KathaHR Katha
    • Exclusive
      • Exclusive Features
      • Research
      • Point Of View
      • Case In Point
      • Dialogue
      • Movement
      • Profile
      • Beyond Work
      • Rising Star
      • By Invitation
    • News
      • Global HR News
      • Compensation & Benefits
      • Diversity
      • Events
      • Gen Y
      • Hiring & Firing
      • HR & Labour Laws
      • Learning & Development
      • Merger & Acquisition
      • Performance Management & Productivity
      • Talent Management
      • Tools & Technology
      • Work-Life Balance
    • Special
      • Cover Story
      • Editorial
      • HR Forecast 2024
      • HR Forecast 2023
      • HR Forecast 2022
      • HR Forecast 2021
      • HR Forecast 2020
      • HR Forecast 2019
      • New Age Learning
      • Coaching and Training
      • Learn-Engage-Transform
    • Magazine
    • Reports
      • Whitepaper
        • HR Forecast 2024 e-mag
        • Future-proofing Manufacturing Through Digital Transformation
        • Employee Healthcare & Wellness Benefits: A Guide for Indian MSMEs
        • Build a Future Ready Organisation For The Road Ahead
        • Employee Experience Strategy
        • HRKatha 2019 Forecast
        • Decoding and Driving Employee Engagement
        • One Platform, Infinite Possibilities
      • Survey Reports
        • Happiness at Work
        • Upskilling for Jobs of the Future
        • The Labour Code 2020
    • Conferences
      • Rising Star Leadership Awards
      • HRKatha Futurecast
      • Automation.NXT
      • The Great HR Debate
    • HR Jobs
    WhatsApp LinkedIn X (Twitter) Facebook Instagram
    HR KathaHR Katha
    Home»Exclusive Features»Location Bias: It matters which part of the town one comes from
    Exclusive Features

    Location Bias: It matters which part of the town one comes from

    Moumita Bhattacharjee | HRKathaBy Moumita Bhattacharjee | HRKathaApril 2, 2021Updated:April 2, 20216 Mins Read54849 Views
    Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook
    Share
    LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

    A LinkedIn user who is a recruiter, mentioned an experience wherein she got to hear something shocking from her client. She reveals that the client had prejudices against a candidate who belonged to a posh locality even though she fit the job requirements to the T. ‘Does she even need the job?’ was her client’s reaction. As appalling as the client’s response was, the truth is that such a possibility cannot be negated. In fact the reverse can also happen – if one is from a particular part of the town, or a suburb he/she is not considered upmarket, and that’s another bias people may have.

    Needless to say – this practice and the associated bias has to stop. In fact, unlike the pre-email era, one can actually do without mentioning the address on the resume. This is why many advise candidates to refrain from mentioning their full addresses on their resumes, because they lead to such unconscious biases mentioned above. Humans love to assume and judge, and that creates prejudices regarding certain locations.

    “Location bias is real. If location is indicated as Gujarat, the bias is that of commercial cunning. If location is West Bengal, revolutionary attitude is the prevailing bias. A North Indian location leads to the bias of an aggressive attitude. Unless robust and fair capability is built for selection without bias, organisations are the ultimate sufferers and competency-based leadership selection is compromised.”

    Adil Malia, chief executive, The Firm

    However, the practice or prejudice will not stop by removing the postal address from the resume as that information can be gathered at the time of the interview.

    Adil Malia, chief executive, The Firm, agrees that locational bias is a reality, and advocates the practice of only mentioning email ID on the resume. “Location bias is real. If location is indicated as Gujarat, the bias is that of commercial cunning. If location is West Bengal, revolutionary attitude is the prevailing bias. A North Indian location leads to the bias of an aggressive attitude. Unless robust and fair capability is built for selection without bias, organisations are the ultimate sufferers and competency-based leadership selection is compromised. Rightly, therefore, most contemporary ‘resumes’ have e-mail addresses so that a locational bias, if any, does not prevail or is duly neutralised,” elaborates Malia.

    The point is that these biases are not just based on regions, but within particular areas within the city – say for instance – South Delhi vs West Delhi or East Delhi or Town vs Suburbs in Mumbai. Within the suburbs as well there is discrimination based on whether one is from Ghatkopar or Virar, or Powai or Andheri.

    People generally love to typecast and that discrimination happens in jobs as well.

    However, not everyone agrees to these practices or prejudices being rampant.

    Praveer Priyadarshi, former HR head and now HR practitioner, reasons that demographic information, current compensation, and location preference are taken into consideration during the screening phase to understand candidates’ location or mobility preferences. Salary fitment is a function of job worth, salary benchmarks and internal parity, rather than the address mentioned by the candidate. “Well run professional organisations having good recruiting practices ensure such biases are taken off the equation through laid down hiring norms which includes designation, level, and salary for the role being evaluated,” he says.

    “In today’s knowledge-driven networked organisations, talent is not physically restricted by any specific place and time. Organisations need to leverage the technology ecosystem and interconnectedness to drive distributed and dynamic capability management, irrespective of the physical location of their employees across geographies.”

    Amit Das, director – HR & CHRO, Bennett Coleman & Company

    It is true that at times, organisations prefer locally-placed resources or those nearer to the office site. A research conducted by David Phillips, an economics professor from the University of Notre Dame revealed that applicants who lived a few miles farther from the job location were considered far lesser than those who are around the location. This study was done in the low-wage category. Staying near the job site lessens commute time and dropouts, but focusing solely on that may lead to lack of diversity in the workforce.

    Amit Das, director – HR & CHRO, Bennett Coleman & Company, explains, “In addition to information, such as academic qualification, family details, contact numbers, and so on, the residential address on the resume is one more demographic data for organisations to have in their records. These records are referred to for different reasons to manage the employee lifecycle needs, and have nothing to do with increasing or reducing bias.”

    Das opines, “In today’s knowledge-driven networked organisations, talent is not physically restricted by any specific place and time. Organisations need to leverage the technology ecosystem and interconnectedness to drive distributed and dynamic capability management, irrespective of the physical location of their employees across geographies.”

    “The traditional approach of arriving at the compa-ratio of job roles driven by market benchmarks, linked with geographic locations, is fast changing. This is due to reverse migration of talent from metro locations, such as Mumbai, to less expensive hometown locations, where they can manage business continuity through remote working flexibility, enabled by 24×7 access and connectivity to their work, workplace and workforce,”points out Das.

    He believes this will drive compensation design philosophy, linked to role expertise and related talent dynamics, instead of having any weightage on the base location address of the prospective candidates mentioned on their resumes.

    Praveer Priyadarshi

    “Well run professional organisations having good recruiting practices ensure such biases are taken off the equation through laid down hiring norms which includes designation, level, and salary for the role being evaluated.”

    Praveer Priyadarshi, former HR head & HR practitioner

    Priyadarshi also mentions that compensation based on location would depend on whether the cost of living is higher or lower in a particular location, and that’s justified.

    Candidates are evaluated on various parameters, which primarily focus on evaluating and validating knowledge, skills and attributes for the role the person is being evaluated for.

    True, it’s certainly the right thing to do, but what we are talking about is prejudices and not compensation based on rightful policies. It’s a fact that no company will have policies that discriminate against people and decide on their compensation based on their respective locations. However, it is also true that people do face such unconscious biases, and that is a reality.

    HR leaders believe that to remove such prejudices, the way out is for organisations to invest in serious communications exercises and build the capability of managers to evolve the right mindset. The focus on pure competency-anchored assessment and selection process becomes thus critical.

    Unconscious biases, such as the one pertaining to geography is a fact and can be worked upon by having a broader mindset. Excluding an address from the resume may not be one of the ways.

    Adila Malia Amit Das Bennett Coleman & Company David Phillips Discrimination Location Bias Praveer Priyadarshi prejudice The Firm
    Share. LinkedIn Twitter Facebook
    Moumita Bhattacharjee | HRKatha
    • Website

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    five × 5 =

    Related Posts

    The invisible crisis: why workers are quietly checking out

    June 24, 2025

    How corporate culture change dies a thousand small deaths

    June 23, 2025

    Employee sues US bank for violating rights, causing mental trauma

    June 20, 2025

    How corporate prejudices are strangling innovation in the workplace

    June 19, 2025

    QUICK HR INSIGHTS

    EDITOR'S PICKS

    The invisible crisis: why workers are quietly checking out

    June 24, 2025

    How corporate culture change dies a thousand small deaths

    June 23, 2025

    The Great Displacement: How automation is reshaping India’s workforce

    June 20, 2025

    How corporate prejudices are strangling innovation in the workplace

    June 19, 2025
    Latest Post

    Hyundai Motor India nears new wage agreement with recognised union

    News June 24, 2025

    Hyundai Motor India (HMIL), the passenger car manufacturer, is set to finalise a new long-term…

    Is AI overhyped? 62% employees say ‘Yes’!

    Research June 24, 2025

    A whopping 78 per cent of employees are using artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the…

    Marriage leave among other HR reforms for Sharjah government employees

    News June 24, 2025

    In a major overhaul of public-sector policies, the Government of Sharjah has introduced a new…

    Former in-n-out employee sues for 25 crore; alleges hair discrimination

    News June 24, 2025

    A former employee of American fast-food giant, In-N-Out Burger has filed a lawsuit seeking damages…

    Asia's No.1 HR Platform

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn WhatsApp Bluesky
    • Our Story
    • Partner with us
    • Career
    • Reach Us
    • Exclusive Features
    • Cover Story
    • Editorial
    • Dive into the Future of Work: Download HRForecast 2024 Now!
    © 2025 HRKatha.com
    • Disclaimer
    • Refunds & Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.