Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Our Story
    • Partner with us
    • Reach Us
    • Career
    Subscribe Newsletter
    HR KathaHR Katha
    • Exclusive
      • Exclusive Features
      • Research
      • Point Of View
      • Case In Point
      • Dialogue
      • Movement
      • Profile
      • Beyond Work
      • Rising Star
      • By Invitation
    • News
      • Global HR News
      • Compensation & Benefits
      • Diversity
      • Events
      • Gen Y
      • Hiring & Firing
      • HR & Labour Laws
      • Learning & Development
      • Merger & Acquisition
      • Performance Management & Productivity
      • Talent Management
      • Tools & Technology
      • Work-Life Balance
    • Special
      • Cover Story
      • Editorial
      • HR Forecast 2024
      • HR Forecast 2023
      • HR Forecast 2022
      • HR Forecast 2021
      • HR Forecast 2020
      • HR Forecast 2019
      • New Age Learning
      • Coaching and Training
      • Learn-Engage-Transform
    • Magazine
    • Reports
      • Whitepaper
        • HR Forecast 2024 e-mag
        • Future-proofing Manufacturing Through Digital Transformation
        • Employee Healthcare & Wellness Benefits: A Guide for Indian MSMEs
        • Build a Future Ready Organisation For The Road Ahead
        • Employee Experience Strategy
        • HRKatha 2019 Forecast
        • Decoding and Driving Employee Engagement
        • One Platform, Infinite Possibilities
      • Survey Reports
        • Happiness at Work
        • Upskilling for Jobs of the Future
        • The Labour Code 2020
    • Conferences
      • HRKatha Futurecast
      • Automation.NXT
      • The Great HR Debate
    • HR Jobs
    WhatsApp LinkedIn X (Twitter) Facebook Instagram
    HR KathaHR Katha
    Home»News»Compensation & Benefits»Salary history ban: Do we need it?
    Compensation & Benefits

    Salary history ban: Do we need it?

    mmBy Arindam Goswami | HRKathaMarch 11, 2020Updated:March 11, 20204 Mins Read13551 Views
    Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook
    Share
    LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

    The ban on asking candidates their salary history has been a hot topic for quite some time now. Already 18 states in the US have banned employers from asking candidates the question. In Germany, employers are prohibited from asking ask candidates about their past earnings unless they volunteer to reveal the information themselves. The goal behind the move is to bring an end to gender pay disparity and unequal remuneration among employees in the same role. However, it may have its own limitations.

    At the outset, a ban on asking salary history is only going to help employees in the junior to middle- management range. It is common for candidates who join to seek parity and compare their earnings with their batchmates or their fellow employees. This tendency has always existed, and starts from the time an individual bags the first job, and goes on till mid-managerial level. Compensation remains a benchmark of success or satisfaction, but only up to a certain point of time. Once a person moves into a leadership role, the importance of remuneration diminishes. This is because, the focus shifts to the role one occupies and the kind of impact one has on the organisation.

    Is the ban truly effective or merely symbolic, to make the interview less awkward for the employee?

    Ravi Mishra

    Salary should not be negotiated but it should be an authentic and holistic reward for the candidate’s competency

    Salary history ban came into significance because salaries happen to be negotiable, and not fixed by title and experience. They do not follow a set rate. This adds a confrontational element to the hiring process. There is also the trade-off that candidates want to secure the highest salary possible for a role, but the employers do not want to pay more than they have to in order to secure an open position. If salaries were standardised or equal pay was the norm everywhere, this would not be an issue. Historically, women have been paid much lower than their male counterparts. Also, some candidates may be stuck in an unfortunate cycle, whereby, because of their historically lower salaries, they are unable to catch up with a better range in their later jobs. The same may hold true for women.

    In the 2019 Pay Scale Survey, it was noted that conducting a gender equity pay audit was a top priority for less than five per cent of the organisations surveyed. Less than 10 per cent organisations looked at providing fair minimum wage as the top priority.

    In 2018, it was noted, that women who refused to reveal their salary history, ended up receiving lower salaries as compared to their male counterparts. Men ended up receiving a higher compensation instead.

    Amit Das

    IN THE ABSENCE OF SALARY HISTORY, There will be a total mismatch in terms of WHAT THE CANDIDATE EXPECTS and what is GIVEN BY THE ORGANISATION.

    Merely banning the question does not stop employers from offering less pay to candidates. Nor does it protect employees who are seeking a higher wage in their current or subsequent organisations. Moreover, women and men who have been historically underpaid, will anyway be unable to estimate what their worth in the job market is.

    Do we need a salary history ban in India?

    According to Amit Das, CHRO, Timesgroup (BCCL), salary history is required for a correct estimate of what to pay the candidate. “The organisation will not be able to pay the candidate as per the expectation in the absence of a salary history. There will be a total mismatch in terms of expectations and what is given.”

    Employers may offer less than the hike employees expect based only on what they assume to be the worth of the role, even if the candidate was receiving a higher wage in the previous organisation.

    Ravi Mishra, SVP-HR, epoxy business, Aditya Birla Chemicals, has a different view in this matter. He opines, “Salary should not be negotiated, but should be an authentic and holistic reward for the candidate’s competency.”

    Mishra goes on to say that if an employer knows the salary history, there is a chance for bias to creep in. And if someone has a historically lower salary range, they may end up accepting a lower amount than others in the same role. The employer, in this case, gets the power to decline any hike asked by the candidate and simply attribute it to the lower market rate. “Knowledge of salary history becomes a negative liability in such cases,” concludes Mishra.

    Compensation Pay Gap Salary History
    Share. LinkedIn Twitter Facebook
    mm
    Arindam Goswami | HRKatha

    Fresh into the HR beat, Arindam began his writing career by volunteering as a student writer during his college days. A fan of almost all kinds of sweets, he enjoys light music. He hails from Assam and holds chai as the best beverage.

    1 Comment

    1. Anonymous on March 20, 2021 3:23 pm

      I am a software developer in IBM India who makes 2.4 LPA. My peers who I mentor make 12 LPA. Don’t we need the salary history ban?
      Your expectations of what your future salary must be can be shared with the company, who can decide whether they can afford to hire you.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    2 × 4 =

    Related Posts

    “Dark factories still a decade away from disrupting India’s employment market,” Sushil Baveja, CHRO, Jindal Stainless

    May 15, 2025

    How Pramerica Life builds an ethical culture that works

    May 15, 2025

    Red flags in job applications: What candidates miss but recruiters spot

    May 14, 2025

    A Nordic food giant’s HR strategy balances culture & coherence

    May 13, 2025
    EDITOR'S PICKS

    “Dark factories still a decade away from disrupting India’s employment market,” Sushil Baveja, CHRO, Jindal Stainless

    May 15, 2025

    How Pramerica Life builds an ethical culture that works

    May 15, 2025

    Red flags in job applications: What candidates miss but recruiters spot

    May 14, 2025

    Managing Gen Z in the workplace: Listening to what isn’t said

    May 13, 2025
    Latest Post

    SV Nathan joins PwC as country leader

    Movement May 15, 2025

    SV Nathan has joined PwC as its country leader. In this role, he will spearhead…

    Amazon eliminates 100 jobs from Devices and Services division

    News May 15, 2025

    Amazon has announced the layoff of 100 employees from its Devices and Services division, which…

    Third Bracket secures INR 50 Million in seed funding

    News May 15, 2025

    AI-driven hiring platform Third Bracket has raised close to INR 50 million in seed funding,…

    NASA employee dismissed amid DEI programme shutdown

    News May 15, 2025

    NASA has reportedly terminated a Caribbean-origin employee after the dismantling of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and…

    Asia's No.1 HR Platform

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn WhatsApp Bluesky
    • Our Story
    • Partner with us
    • Career
    • Reach Us
    • Exclusive Features
    • Cover Story
    • Editorial
    • Dive into the Future of Work: Download HRForecast 2024 Now!
    © 2025 HRKatha.com
    • Disclaimer
    • Refunds & Cancellation Policy
    • Terms of Service

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.