In today’s fluid workplace, the chasm between what one is hired to do and what one actually does widens imperceptibly. It often begins innocuously: a colleague in distress needs assistance with a “one-off” task. Soon, an employee is drafted into projects because “they’re brilliant at this sort of thing”. Before long, responsibilities have ballooned far beyond the original remit—without the title, compensation or recognition to match. This phenomenon has a name: job description creep. Though seemingly subtle, its impact on wellbeing, motivation and performance can be profound.
Job description creep manifests differently across roles and industries. In startups, employees often juggle multiple functions—switching from product development to customer support in a single day. In larger organisations, it might involve mid-level managers spearheading new initiatives without corresponding adjustments to title or compensation.
Kamlesh Dangi, Group Head-HR, InCred, highlights the contextual nature of the issue. He notes that while managerial roles often demand flexibility and a focus on outcomes, task-oriented or clerical positions come with an expectation of clearly defined responsibilities. “For managerial jobs, stretching oneself is part of the role. But for task-driven roles, employees rightfully expect their job descriptions to be respected,” he says.
“For managerial jobs, stretching oneself is part of the role. But for task-driven roles, employees rightfully expect their job descriptions to be respected.”
Kamlesh Dangi, Group Head-HR, InCred
The phenomenon is often symptomatic of organisational dynamics. In lean teams or growing companies, staffing often lags behind workload demands, leading managers to rely on top performers. Chandrasekhar Mukherjee, a seasoned HR leader, observes that such reliance is not typically exploitative but stems from trust and necessity. “Managers delegate to those who excel, but this approach isn’t always sustainable,” he says. “If unacknowledged over time, it becomes a significant issue.”
Employees themselves can inadvertently contribute to job description creep, often by embracing new responsibilities in the hope of recognition or advancement. However, this can lead to mismatched expectations if organisations fail to follow through with rewards or promotions.
“It is crucial to understand why additional work is being assigned—whether it’s temporary due to attrition or a permanent shift in business needs,” Dangi advises. Without clarity, employees risk overextending themselves without the expected benefits.
“What seemed relevant six months ago may not apply anymore. While adaptability is essential, it’s equally important for employees to manage their boundaries effectively.”
Tanaya Mishra, CHRO, InSolutions Global
The rapid evolution of workplace technology further compounds the issue. Tanaya Mishra, CHRO, InSolutions Global, notes that roles today are highly dynamic. “What seemed relevant six months ago may not apply anymore. While adaptability is essential, it’s equally important for employees to manage their boundaries effectively,” she explains.
Identifying the signs
Recognising the early indicators of job description creep is crucial for employees. Key signs include spending increasing amounts of time on tasks outside their core responsibilities and observing a shift in focus away from their original duties without formal realignment.
“Managers delegate to those who excel, but this approach isn’t always sustainable. If unacknowledged over time, it becomes a significant issue.”
Chandrasekhar Mukherjee, senior HR leader
Internally, a fear of seeming uncooperative or incapable often drives employees to overcommit. This mindset can lead to unsustainable workloads and set unrealistic expectations for their availability.
When job description creep begins to feel unsustainable, addressing the issue directly with a manager is essential. Constructive conversations can help clarify expectations, prioritise tasks, and establish boundaries. Mukherjee emphasises that such discussions should be approached tactfully. “Start by expressing appreciation for the opportunities, raise concerns constructively, and propose solutions,” he suggests.
For instance, a marketing analyst facing job description creep might approach their manager with a solution-focused attitude. They could acknowledge the value of new responsibilities while highlighting the impact on their core duties, framing the discussion as an effort to ensure both areas receive adequate attention.
This approach signals a willingness to contribute while advocating for sustainable workload management.
In organisations with persistent understaffing or ambiguous role structures, informal conversations may not suffice. In such cases, formal renegotiation becomes necessary. This might involve requesting updated job descriptions, clearer KPIs, or additional resources such as delegation support or new hires.
Employees whose roles have significantly expanded may also consider discussing title changes or compensation adjustments. Although such conversations can be uncomfortable, framing them around measurable contributions and business outcomes can help open productive dialogue.
For instance, a senior product manager who had taken on strategic initiatives might highlight their added responsibilities and their impact during discussions with leadership, framing their request as a natural progression aligned with their contributions.
Not all instances of job description creep are detrimental. Many employees grow by taking on more—provided their efforts are recognised and rewarded. In some organisations, expanded roles are precursors to formal promotions, serving as a test of leadership readiness.
Mukherjee notes that follow-through is essential in such cases. “Increased responsibilities can be empowering if they lead to growth. But without recognition, they can breed resentment,” he explains.
Dangi recommends a nuanced perspective. Employees aspiring for advancement might see additional responsibilities as stepping stones, while those seeking stability should advocate for defined boundaries and structure.
Navigating the modern workplace
The pandemic and shifting work norms have made roles increasingly fluid, requiring employees to adapt to evolving demands. However, this adaptability should not come at the expense of well-being or job satisfaction.
Employees must learn to advocate for themselves through open dialogue, formal renegotiation, or by setting professional boundaries. Mishra emphasises that pushing back is not an act of defiance but a strategic move to ensure sustainable growth.
Job description creep often arises from trust, opportunity, or shifting business needs. However, if left unaddressed, it can lead to burnout and disengagement. Employees must stay vigilant, recognise the signs, and proactively address the issue with tact and professionalism. By doing so, they not only safeguard their careers but also contribute to fostering healthier and more transparent workplace cultures.
1 Comment
Cross functional roles must be defined and well documented before hand, in written and with consent of the employer/employee. But for more than one day of extra work, the said employee must be compensated.
Cross functional roles are useful if another employee has taken sick, on leave or assigned other duties. There are five roles in such cases. One is the primary one,with four secondary tasks.