Picture a meeting room: a junior employee presents an innovative solution, only to be dismissed—not for the merit of her idea, but for sounding ‘too aggressive’ or ‘not respectful enough’. This practice, known as tone policing, has become a subtle but powerful force shaping Indian workplace dynamics, particularly affecting those whose voices organisations most need to hear.
In India’s corporate corridors, where hierarchy often dictates discourse, tone policing manifests uniquely. It might surface when a young manager from the east is told to ‘work on their accent’, or when a woman technologist’s urgent project concerns are dismissed as ‘too emotional’. The focus shifts from the substance of their message to its delivery—a subtle but effective way of maintaining traditional power structures.
“When organisations fail to accommodate diverse personalities—irrespective of gender—it creates an environment where individuals cannot bring their authentic selves to work,” observes Udbhav Ganjoo, head – HR, global operations, Viatris. “Instead, they are forced to mould their communication styles to avoid tone policing, which inevitably undermines inclusion.”
“When organisations fail to accommodate diverse personalities—irrespective of gender—it creates an environment where individuals cannot bring their authentic selves to work. Instead, they are forced to mould their communication styles to avoid tone policing, which inevitably undermines inclusion.”
Udbhav Ganjoo, head – HR, global operations, Viatris
The impact falls heaviest on those already navigating complex workplace hierarchies. Shaleen Manik, chief human resources officer, Transsion India, notes that “Marginalised employees, already at a disadvantage due to various factors, may silence themselves when tone policing becomes a norm. They corner themselves, fearing retaliation or being labelled difficult.” Women in particular face greater scrutiny, expected to be simultaneously assertive yet deferential—a balancing act their male colleagues rarely need to perform.
The practice often stems from deeply embedded cultural norms about “professional” behaviour in Indian workplaces. “Even if you are saying the right things, if your tone is not correct, you may be typecast,” explains Rishav Dev, head of talent acquisition at Century Plywoods. “It can happen to anyone at any level, but it disproportionately affects those who already face systemic disadvantages.”
“Marginalised employees, already at a disadvantage due to various factors, may silence themselves when tone policing becomes a norm. They corner themselves, fearing retaliation or being labelled difficult.”
Shaleen Manik, chief human resources officer, Transsion India
The psychological toll can be severe. Junior employees subject to persistent tone policing often experience diminished self-esteem and growing self-doubt about their communication style. Many choose silence over scrutiny, withdrawing from vital conversations. “If employees feel their emotions are unwelcome, they may withhold feedback, depriving the organisation of valuable insights,” Manik points out. “This stifles innovation and reinforces a culture of silence.”
In traditional Indian corporate structures, where deference to authority is deeply ingrained, tone policing tends to flourish. It serves as a tool for maintaining hierarchical structures, with seniors—often unconsciously—using it to assert control. The practice becomes particularly problematic when it intersects with gender expectations, regional stereotypes, and hierarchical norms.
“Even if you are saying the right things, if your tone is not correct, you may be typecast. It can happen to anyone at any level, but it disproportionately affects those who already face systemic disadvantages.”
Rishav Dev, head of talent acquisition at Century Plywoods
Some organisations are actively working to combat this phenomenon. Progressive Indian companies are implementing training programmes that emphasise substance over style in communications. Leaders are being trained to evaluate content rather than delivery, creating environments where diverse voices can flourish without fear of tone-based criticism.
The solution requires a multi-pronged approach sensitive to Indian workplace culture. Leaders must first acknowledge their own biases about “appropriate” communication styles. As Dev emphasises, “Leaders must introspect on how their words impact others. They need to be conscious of the environment they’re creating.” This becomes particularly crucial in India’s increasingly young, dynamic workforce where traditional hierarchical communication norms may clash with newer, more direct styles.
For employees navigating these waters, strategic communication becomes crucial. Framing concerns in terms of organisational goals can make them harder to dismiss. Building allies across hierarchical levels and maintaining detailed records of tone policing incidents can provide both support and evidence when seeking systemic change. A simple redirect like “I’d like to focus on my point about project outcomes” can help steer conversations back to substance.
Cultural transformation requires sustained effort, particularly in a context where respect for authority often translates into communication constraints. Regular feedback mechanisms and open forums can help organisations address tone policing at its root. HR departments play a crucial role, providing channels for reporting incidents and implementing training programmes that promote inclusive communication while respecting cultural nuances.
The stakes are higher than mere workplace harmony. In an era where India’s global competitiveness increasingly depends on innovation and diverse perspectives, tone policing functions as an invisible barrier to progress. As Manik puts it, “Inclusion requires organisations to embrace emotions and authenticity as part of the human experience.”
The message is clear: Indian organisations that wish to harness the full potential of their workforce must move beyond superficial notions of “appropriate” communication. In today’s workplace, the tone of voice that matters most is the one that speaks truth to power—regardless of whether it follows traditional hierarchical scripts.