Imagine a world-class athlete training tirelessly, their every move meticulously planned. Yet, something is missing. No matter how skilled or dedicated, without a coach, their potential remains untapped. Coaches are the unsung heroes of athletic achievement, guiding athletes to their peak performance. Dan Moore, High-Performance Coach for the British Rowing Men’s Squad, encapsulates this perfectly when he says, “As a leader, it is my role to ensure the team is engaged and working towards a shared goal—getting the boat across the finish line in the best possible time.”
Now, consider the corporate world. Would it make sense for employees to be directed by managers who simply instruct rather than mentor? The answer is a resounding no. Just as in sports, where even the most talented athletes require coaching to unlock their full potential, employees in a corporate environment thrive under the guidance of a coach rather than the command of a manager. The distinction is crucial: coaches don’t just manage tasks—they elevate performance, nurture potential, and foster innovation.
Traditionally, high performers in specific roles are promoted to management positions. They ascend the ranks not because of their leadership skills but due to their expertise in a particular domain. However, excellence in one’s field does not necessarily translate into effective management. The result? A proliferation of managers who default to a “command and control” style—directing, dictating, and driving employees to replicate past successes rather than fostering a culture of innovation and growth. This approach, rooted in tradition, is increasingly out of step with the demands of today’s fast-paced, dynamic business environments.
In contrast, the modern manager must evolve into a coach—a role that emphasises support, guidance, and the development of employees’ capacity to adapt to change. Coaching is not just a trend but a fundamental shift in leadership philosophy. The effective coach-turned-manager asks questions instead of providing all the answers, supports employees in their development journeys, and creates an environment where innovation and creativity can flourish.
Imagine MS Dhoni trying to explain the intricacies of a helicopter shot to a novice. Despite their own mastery of the shot, they might struggle to articulate the mechanics they execute so naturally. This gap highlights a critical point: individuals who excel at certain tasks often do so intuitively, without the ability to teach others how to replicate their success. Once these individuals are promoted to management, they may find themselves ill-equipped to guide their teams effectively—a challenge that underscores the importance of adopting a coaching mindset.
Gareth Chick, who trains senior executives at Google, emphasises this shift in mindset. He advises newly appointed managers to embrace uncertainty by asking questions to which they don’t know the answers. This approach reflects a departure from the traditional expectation that managers should have all the answers and highlights the importance of fostering a culture of learning and growth within teams.
The difference between a manager and a coach is stark. A manager often assumes that everyone operates like they do, expecting tasks to be completed in a manner identical to their own approach. Conversely, a coach is outcome-focused, caring less about the specific path taken to achieve a goal and more about the result. This shift from micromanagement to empowerment can have a transformative effect on organisational culture.
In smaller companies, the “command and control” model is particularly pervasive. Often, a founder or CEO becomes a bottleneck, with all decisions funnelled through them. This creates a dependency that stifles innovation and discourages independent thought. However, when companies replace managers with coaches, as seen at Time Etc, the results can be remarkable. Employees at Time Etc became 20% more productive and significantly happier after making this shift. Coaches at the company focused on mentoring, offering constructive feedback, and empowering employees to identify and implement the best ways to achieve their goals. The emphasis was on support rather than direction, leading to a more engaged and effective workforce.
A coach’s primary focus is on the individual—helping them become who they aspire to be. Coaching is about building awareness, empowering choice, and encouraging positive change. This people-centric approach contrasts with traditional management, which often prioritises organisational needs over individual growth.
While a manager may offer valuable knowledge and experience, this top-down approach can limit an employee’s development by stifling their intrinsic motivation and creativity. In today’s complex work environments, where the pace of change is relentless, it’s not always safe to assume that the manager knows best. True leadership lies in asking the right questions and facilitating the discovery of new answers.
Coaching also permeates daily interactions in the workplace, often occurring in brief but impactful exchanges. A manager-turned-coach might respond to a request for guidance with a probing question like, “What have you already considered?” or “What truly matters in this situation?” When such inquiries become a regular part of the workplace culture, it signals a shift toward a more inquisitive and empowering management style—one that values exploration and learning over prescriptive solutions.
It’s easy to believe that being a good manager equates to being a good coach, but the two roles are fundamentally different. Directing is about clarifying strategy, goals, and roles—ensuring that the team understands what success looks like and who is responsible for what. Coaching, on the other hand, is about developing individuals to navigate their challenges independently. It’s about helping them grow so they can achieve more of what they want in the most effective way possible.
Unfortunately, coaching remains under-appreciated in many organisations, especially in fast-paced, high-pressure environments like the tech industry. Managers often lack exposure to effective coaching models and, as a result, fail to develop the skills needed to support their teams’ long-term growth. Instead, they focus on short-term results, prioritising immediate output over sustainable development. Yet, in the long run, a coaching approach yields far greater benefits—producing a workforce that is not only more capable but also more innovative and self-sufficient.
The future of leadership lies in coaching. While managing aims for quick wins, coaching invests in long-term success, cultivating a team of highly skilled, creative, and autonomous employees. As the business landscape continues to evolve, the most successful leaders will be those who embrace their role as coaches—guiding their teams not just to meet today’s challenges but to thrive in tomorrow’s opportunities. The shift from manager to coach is not just a trend—it’s a necessary evolution for those who aspire to lead in a world where agility, innovation, and human potential are the keys to success.
3 Comments
Very effectively articulated the role of coach as a Navigator..
Hi Prajjal,
Very good article ! My journey is also from Manager to Lean-Agile coach. Command and control style of leadership is no more working in today’s time. Hence I think every manager shall equo themselves to become good and Coach are true Leaders. Thank you. Mahendra Gaikwad (Lean-Agile Coach)
Good read. And a coach is one who listens, listens more deeply to respond with trust, faith and not amorphous.